Most Active Stories
- Would 'Right To Farm' Ballot Question Protect Family Farms Or Ag Corporations?
- Ameren blames EPA standards for coal plant closure, Nixon signs bill to allow less restrictions
- Why the health insurance marketplace could be called a success in Missouri
- MODOT makes revisions to Amendment 7 project list
- Why rural Missouri is losing doctors
Tue January 31, 2012
Judge hears redistricting arguments
Opening arguments were held Tuesday for the congressional redistricting lawsuit. The suit is being held in lower court because the Missouri Supreme Court ordered a review of the redrawn map.
Attorneys for the plaintiffs argued that the state constitution requires Missouri’s congressional districts to be as compact as possible, and that the map passed by lawmakers last year fails that test. Jim Layton, arguing for the state, told Judge Daniel Green that drawing a map that would meet everyone’s definition of compactness is impossible.
“The question before you, your Honor, will be: Have these plaintiffs proven (that) the HB193 plan does not fall into the acceptable range? And frankly, I don’t believe they can do it," Layton said.
Missouri is losing a congressional district due to slow population growth. The State Supreme Court has given Judge Green until Friday to render a decision.
The court hearing will continue Wednesday.