© 2024 University of Missouri - KBIA
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Missouri Supreme Court to consider how losing parental rights in the past should impact the future

The Missouri Supreme Court will decide whether the fact that a parent has lost custody of children in the past is enough to prove he or she is still unfit.
Rici Hoffarth | St. Louis Public Radio
The Missouri Supreme Court will decide whether the fact that a parent has lost custody of children in the past is enough to prove he or she is still unfit.

The Missouri Supreme Court will hear arguments Thursday on whether the state can determine that a mother is unfit because a court has previously terminated her right to parent other children.

The case involves a Kansas City-area mother who lost the rights to her older children — a ruling that became evidence in a hearing over infant twin girls. Her attorneys say the law that allows that to happen violates her constitutional rights to be a parent.

Missouri's law was one of several similar measures adopted nationwide after a 1997 federal law encouraged states to speed up the process of ensuring that children in the care of the state are reunited with their parents, or adopted.

Thursday's case involves a Kansas-City area mother unnamed in court documents who gave birth to twin girls in 2015, as a court was already considering whether she was fit to care for three older children. Officials immediately put the babies in foster care.

A judge ruled in August 2016 that the mother, who had struggled with mental health issues, was not fit to care for the older children. Authorities relied on that case to prove she was still unfit, and the court terminated her rights to the twins in December 2016. A couple who served as their foster parents later adopted them.

Attorneys for the mother argue the law violated her fundamental right to be a parent by making her prove she is fit, rather than the state having to show she isn't. Her past should be something the court considers, but not the only thing, said Christopher Neace, one of three attorneys appointed to the case.

"Our argument is that this mother was making substantial progress, and that the application of the presumption permeated the way the court looked at the evidence and the way the court evaluated the evidence," Neace said.

Attorneys for the state, the twin girls and the couple who adopted them argued in briefs that the mother had plenty of chances during court hearings to show that the situation had changed between August and December. They also said plenty of other evidence showed the mother was still struggling with mental health issues.

Follow Rachel on Twitter: @rlippmann 

Copyright 2021 St. Louis Public Radio. To see more, visit St. Louis Public Radio.

Lippmann returned to her native St. Louis after spending two years covering state government in Lansing, Michigan. She earned her undergraduate degree from Northwestern University and followed (though not directly) in Maria Altman's footsteps in Springfield, also earning her graduate degree in public affairs reporting. She's also done reporting stints in Detroit, Michigan and Austin, Texas. Rachel likes to fill her free time with good books, good friends, good food, and good baseball.
Rachel Lippmann
Lippmann returned to her native St. Louis after spending two years covering state government in Lansing, Michigan. She earned her undergraduate degree from Northwestern University and followed (though not directly) in Maria Altman's footsteps in Springfield, also earning her graduate degree in public affairs reporting. She's also done reporting stints in Detroit, Michigan and Austin, Texas. Rachel likes to fill her free time with good books, good friends, good food, and good baseball.